The Calm Before the Surge: why RH’s war chest could be a game-changer

Key message: this is a scenario, not a guarantee. But if it plays out, it could have major consequences for HEX, PLS, PLSX, INC — and for the breadth of the PulseChain ecosystem. What many find controversial is that Richard Heart does not “work for us.” That is true — yet in the corporate world it is perfectly normal for companies to buy back their own shares to support the price and increase shareholder value. Why would Richard Heart not do the same for his own crypto? It strengthens his projects and directly contributes to his glory status as the founder and builder of this ecosystem.

1) The war chest, explained

During the various Sacrifices, RH converted all received crypto into DAI. Only after his lawyers gave the green light did he deploy part of it to buy $628 million of ETH. The logic is simple yet powerful: use ETH profits to strengthen the ecosystem via targeted buybacks.
  • At ETH = $6,008, his position would be worth around $1 billion — over $370 million in profit.
  • He could begin buying once > $250 million in profit is realized (he may wait longer — time will tell).
  • If ETH advances toward $18,000, the treasury could reach ~$3 billion.
Scenario: if he then deploys $1 billion to support the ecosystem, he still keeps > $1.3 billion profit on the DAI position. A logical next step: rotate back to DAI and, in the bear market, place it in a high-yield stable-pool farm. The result? PulseChain likely becomes one of the most liquid chains in a bear market.

⬆️ Back to top

2) What if $500 million is deployed surgically?

Assume RH allocates $500 million according to the PAMPI simulation (50% HEX, 25% PLS, 25% PLSX) and we model against current, intentionally constrained liquidity, plus sell pressure of 80% on HEX, 75% on PLSX and 70% on PLS. The picture gets fascinating:
  • HEX → $9.70 (~800×)
  • PLS → $0.00749 (~146×)
  • PLSX → $0.00955 (~241×)
  • INC → $460 (~219×) via liquidity bonding
Important: these simulations do not yet include FOMO. In live markets, demand panics often create overshoots. Prices could go higher — but nothing is guaranteed.

⬆️ Back to top

3) Why this time could be different

In recent years RH could do nothing about steep drawdowns due to the SEC lawsuit. From this part of the 4-year cycle onward, he has both hands free to do what’s best for the ecosystem. That’s why I don’t expect the next bear market to revisit -90% or worse. A normal correction around ~ -75% remains realistic — and right there lie the life-changing buying opportunities.

⬆️ Back to top

4) From simulations to strategy: preparing for 2029

Moonshot numbers are exciting, but they only matter if you have a plan. The next 8–10 months are not about chasing every pump, but about preparing for the wave that could crest into 2029.
  • Build “dry powder.” Have capital ready for the inevitable -75% correction.
  • Layer in smartly. Don’t go all-in at once; tranche your entries to keep your average entry sharp.
  • Also live. If you wish, use half of your dry powder over the next three years to upgrade lifestyle and enjoy additional financial bandwidth. Freedom is a return, too.
This is how you translate simulations into strategy: position yourself so that even conservative scenarios become life-changing outcomes.

⬆️ Back to top

5) Reality & expectations

  • This is not financial advice.
  • It’s a scenario grounded in market mechanics (liquidity, sell pressure, bonding) and history: Richard Heart helped drive HEX ~10,000× in 2021.
  • That’s why these projections are deliberately conservative. Once FOMO kicks in and liquidity is further optimized, moves can be faster and higher than models suggest.

⬆️ Back to top

6) Freedom needs diversity: look beyond your comfort zone

PulseChain brands itself as the Freedom Blockchain. Freedom implies choice — for users, builders and capital. That’s why I want to gently but clearly advocate for other projects within the Richard Heart universe. Consider building blocks from the Atropa ecosystem such as pDAI and pWBTC. Yes, some view them as controversial. But experimentation and variety bring:
  • More use-cases and fresh liquidity flows;
  • Extra optionality for different risk profiles, from nocoiners to pros;
  • The chance of unexpected product-market fit that only becomes obvious in hindsight.
Even projects you don’t (yet) understand can be net positive: they attract users, volume and attention, helping PulseChain become a home base for a broader audience. In the end, RH tokens benefit materially — greater demand, deeper liquidity, better price discovery. Keep your eyes open, stay critical but avoid tribalism: diversity isn’t a detour, it’s antifragile infrastructure.

⬆️ Back to top

Closing

We may be on the brink of the strongest capital rotation within the RH ecosystem to date. If ETH profits are deployed as outlined, if allocation flows to HEX/PLS/PLSX per the PAMPI simulation, and if we as a community leave room for diverse (even controversial) building blocks… this could be the moment we’ve been waiting for. Stay calm. Build your plan. Stay open to innovation. And be ready when the wave arrives. 🍀🤞

⬆️ Back to top

Share:

More Posts

Scroll to Top